Artificial Intelligence
Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Tools
IJoT recognizes that artificial intelligence (AI) and AI-assisted technologies are increasingly used in research and scholarly writing. Such tools may be used in a limited manner, but they must not replace human intellectual contribution, critical analysis, or scholarly judgment. AI use must not compromise research ethics, confidentiality or data protection standards.
- AI Use by authors
Authors are allowed to use generative AI as a basic tool for certain tasks such as idea exploration, language polishing, formatting, but must not generate substantive scholarly content or serve as a substitute for the author’s original work. Authors must take responsibility for the output of AI tools. Manuscripts generated primarily by AI are not acceptable.
Authors must disclose any use of generative AI tools in the preparation of a manuscript, including the name of the tool, how it was used, and the reason for any use that goes beyond what is permitted, so that the editors can assess its appropriateness and make an informed editorial decision.
AI tools must not be cited or listed as authors, as authorship requires accountability and responsibility. Undisclosed AI-generated content may constitute grounds for rejection or retraction.
- Use of AI in peer review and editorial work
To protect the integrity and confidentiality of peer review, reviewers and editors must not upload manuscripts or review materials into generative AI tools or use AI to generate/write peer-review reports or editorial decisions.
AI tools may be used cautiously for limited administrative support, such as identifying potential reviewers, but all reviewer selection and editorial decisions must involve human oversight and critical judgment. Any reviewer suggestions generated with the assistance of AI tools must be independently verified by the editor to confirm the reviewer’s identity, expertise, and suitability.
